2019 International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ivcnz48456.2019.8961002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Power Line Detection Network using Visible Light and Infrared Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of authors’ knowledge, almost all the studies regarding PL detection use the dice scores (DSC) (also known as the F1-score), precision, true positive rate (TPR) (also known as recall or sensitivity), false discovery rate (FDR) and accuracy [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. These evaluation parameters are defined as: DSC or F1-score = 2TP/(2TP + FP +FN) Precision = TP/(TP + FP) TPR or Recall or Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) FDR = FP/(FP + TP) Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN) where TP, TN, FP and FN represent the true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative entries of the confusion matrix, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of authors’ knowledge, almost all the studies regarding PL detection use the dice scores (DSC) (also known as the F1-score), precision, true positive rate (TPR) (also known as recall or sensitivity), false discovery rate (FDR) and accuracy [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. These evaluation parameters are defined as: DSC or F1-score = 2TP/(2TP + FP +FN) Precision = TP/(TP + FP) TPR or Recall or Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) FDR = FP/(FP + TP) Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN) where TP, TN, FP and FN represent the true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative entries of the confusion matrix, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as PL detection is concerned, the work in [ 8 ] utilizes a compound loss based on BCE loss and the Jaccard loss [ 34 ] with a weighting parameter λ to weight the Jaccard loss. The study, however, lacks a thorough investigation of the proposed compound loss with other losses.…”
Section: Related Work and Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have listed the examples of such proofs of concept and published results in Table 2 . These are investigated in the context of power line inspection, helping for instance in: robust defect analysis for power line equipment using convolutional neural networks (CNN), achieving, with this large evaluation dataset, up to 98% accuracy [ 36 ]; preventing cascading failures of the grid [ 37 ]; detecting power lines themselves using CNNs [ 26 , 38 , 39 ], or method based on epipolar constraints (PLAMEC) [ 40 ]; transmission tower construction inspection (with detection of AP 89.9% [ 41 ]; or mAP of 94% using the ResNet50 framework [ 42 ]); for power line corridor monitoring with a mean average precision (mAP) of 72.45% from satellite imagery [ 27 ], or separation for vegetation management around power lines using time series analysis [ 43 ], or single images only [ 44 ]; for sub-element diagnostics, such as conductor detection purposes (with AP of 0.729 [ 12 ]) or insulator detection [ 45 ]. …”
Section: Power Line Elements Datasets Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%