1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46274-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time pelvic ultrasonography during the periovulatory period of patients attending an artificial insemination clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…::: :;~u.ij; cUllulluing earlier reports [3,[11][12][13]. However, there are studies which did not find any significant difference in the leading follicular diameter between the spontaneous and CC stimulated cycles [14,15]. The range of follicular diameter at which ovulation occurred was more or less same in both the groups confirming earlier studies [3,13,14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…::: :;~u.ij; cUllulluing earlier reports [3,[11][12][13]. However, there are studies which did not find any significant difference in the leading follicular diameter between the spontaneous and CC stimulated cycles [14,15]. The range of follicular diameter at which ovulation occurred was more or less same in both the groups confirming earlier studies [3,13,14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While there are studies reporting larger follicle diameters in CC stimulated cycles [3,[11][12][13]; others reported no difference in follicular growth between spontaneous and CC stimulated cycle [14,15]. The present study is aimed at transvaginal sonographic evaluation of follicular dynamics in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate (CC) stimulated cycles, in the same patients, at a service hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The luteinising hormone peak has been extensively assessed, compared with direct laparoscopy 3 ; but it is still an indirect index of the expected day of ovulation (luteinising hormone‐expected date of ovulation) and it is often subject to biological variations 4 . On the other hand, although less accurate than laparoscopy 5–9 , ultrasound detection of the day of ovulation (US‐DO) is a direct method. Yet, its disadvantage is the risk of subjective interpretations of the ovaries’ ultrasonic morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All follicles >5 mm were measured. Only those women with a leading follicle >18 mm and an endometrial thickness >9 mm were inseminated (Marinho et al . 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%