2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time PCR quantification of bacterial adhesion to Caco-2 cells: Competition between bifidobacteria and enteropathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the similarity of origin between the Caco-2, HT-29 and HRT-18 strains, and the lack of reports on the use of the HRT-18 strain, data on the adhesion of LAB in Caco-2 cells were used for comparison. The adhesion capacity of P. acidilactici B14 in HRT-18 cells was considered as absent when using the standard of no adhesiveness (<5 bacteria/ Caco-2 cell) (Candela et al 2005). However, considering the parameters proposed by Del Re et al (2000), who evaluated the adhesive capacity of strains of B. longum and defined 'strong' as adhesive capacity over 40 bacteria/100 Caco-2 cells, then the P. acidilactici B14 strain showed strong adhesive capacity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the similarity of origin between the Caco-2, HT-29 and HRT-18 strains, and the lack of reports on the use of the HRT-18 strain, data on the adhesion of LAB in Caco-2 cells were used for comparison. The adhesion capacity of P. acidilactici B14 in HRT-18 cells was considered as absent when using the standard of no adhesiveness (<5 bacteria/ Caco-2 cell) (Candela et al 2005). However, considering the parameters proposed by Del Re et al (2000), who evaluated the adhesive capacity of strains of B. longum and defined 'strong' as adhesive capacity over 40 bacteria/100 Caco-2 cells, then the P. acidilactici B14 strain showed strong adhesive capacity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some probiotic have the ability to block the intestinal mucosal receptor, thus prevent adhesion of pathogenic bacteria. Several strains of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria are able to compete with many pathogenic bacteria such as Bacteroides vulgates, Enterobacter aerogene, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, enterotoxigenic E. coli and enteropathogenic E. coli for intestinal epithelial cell binding (Collado et al, 2007;Candela et al, 2005;Roselli et al, 2006;Sherman et al, 2005). Displacement of pathogenic bacteria can also occur even if the pathogen have attached to intestinal epithelial cells prior to prebiotic treatment (Collado et al, 2007;Candela et al, 2005).…”
Section: Competitive Exclusion Of Microbial Adhesion or Translocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. animalis subsp. lactis BI07 adhesion to HT29 monolayers was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) as reported by Candela et al (9). For each experimental condition, six independent replica experiments were performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in order to investigate the role of human Plg in the B. animalis subsp. lactis BI07-enterocyte interaction process, bacterial cells were preincubated with human Plg (Sigma) as reported by Attali et al (2) and then subjected to a conventional HT29 cell adhesion assay (9). Thirty-minute preincubation at 37°C with 100 g/ml human Plg significantly enhanced B. animalis subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation