AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-5825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Path Planning and Terrain Obstacle Avoidance for General Aviation Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output parameter of the heading controller, which represents the yaw rate command is built depending on both the range distance between the UAV and the center of the obstacle, and the perpendicular offset between the obstacle center and the current line of sight. The general form of the rules is indicated by Equation (4) and specific rules for each fuzzy logic is given in Equations (5)- (7). Five triangle fuzzy sets are selected for the distance input, and these sets are extended over the universe of discourse in the range [1 6] km as shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Control and Guidance Systems Attitude Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The output parameter of the heading controller, which represents the yaw rate command is built depending on both the range distance between the UAV and the center of the obstacle, and the perpendicular offset between the obstacle center and the current line of sight. The general form of the rules is indicated by Equation (4) and specific rules for each fuzzy logic is given in Equations (5)- (7). Five triangle fuzzy sets are selected for the distance input, and these sets are extended over the universe of discourse in the range [1 6] km as shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Control and Guidance Systems Attitude Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge for the operation of autonomous UAVs is to be able to efficiently carry out the assigned tasks without compromising the success of the mission by flying into obstacles and/or restricted areas or becoming exposed to unacceptable levels of threat risk. [5][6][7] As a consequence, researchers working with advanced UAVs have moved their focus from system modeling and low level control to higher level mission planning, system supervision, and collision avoidance aspects, while simultaneously transitioning from vehicle constraints to mission constraints. 8,9 These challenges can be addressed by developing a flexible and powerful trajectory management system which includes a well behaved control and guidance system in additional to optimal path planning and tracking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations that once required proprietary, specialized, and expensive computer mainframe hardware is now executed using common and cheaply procured personal computers with a much wider When simulations began to exhaust the hardware and software resources of a single PC, multiple network-distributed computers began to be used for executing a simulation. The expansion to multiple PCs was due to simulation of large numbers of complex simulated agents and vehicles [14,18,19], considerably complex and high fidelity environments and vehicles [18,20,21,22], standalone commercial-off-the-shelf [17] (COTS) software integration to simulation networks [14,23], and other features and capabilities expanded upon from and by previous generations of architectures [14,24]. Distributed simulations increase scalability, flexibility, and reconfigurability of a simulation environment promoting exchange, reuse, and inter-operation between multiple simulation components [25] Provided drivers are available for the PC networking hardware in use, virtually all modern desktop and server operating systems support communication using these protocols.…”
Section: Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hrabar 6) studied real-time three-dimensional path planning for rotorcraft using PRM and D* algorithms. Doebbler 7) also investigated real-time path planning for aviation aircraft using an A* algorithm. Although these algorithms enable rapid path determination, they are not flight-worthy because they consider few or no issues of dynamic correctness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%