Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2009.4939585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time on-road vehicle and motorcycle detection using a single camera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches above may not be able to detect motorcycles and bicycles. Therefore, in [97], [98], along with edges, shadow and black Fig. 11.…”
Section: ) Motion Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The approaches above may not be able to detect motorcycles and bicycles. Therefore, in [97], [98], along with edges, shadow and black Fig. 11.…”
Section: ) Motion Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is easier to identify and track a motorcycle among the vehicles. However, the algorithms proposed in [97], [98] might fail to detect motorcycles during nighttime since the shadow information used is no longer applicable.…”
Section: F Analysis On Motorcycle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, motorcycle detection is becoming very important, specially in developing countries, where they are involved in a large share of the traffic and so high accident rates are reported, due to the high vulnerability of this kind of vehicle. Until now most motorcycle video detection systems are implemented using conventional feature extraction techniques such as 3D models [1] [2], vehicle dimensions [3] [4] [5], symmetry, color, shadow, geometrical features and texture and even wheel contours [6]. Other works report the use of stable features [7], HOG for evaluation of helmet presence [8] [9], variations of HOG [10] [11], and the use of SIFT, DSIFT and SURF [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%