2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time observation of graphene layer growth: Coupling of the interlayer spacing with thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). A detailed description of the chamber is also presented in our previous report [ 35 ]. The silicon substrate is mounted face down on the heating stage with a narrow gap between the Si and the heating stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). A detailed description of the chamber is also presented in our previous report [ 35 ]. The silicon substrate is mounted face down on the heating stage with a narrow gap between the Si and the heating stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HRTEM images of LCF-Cu 120-300 are displayed in Figure 2b, a multilayer ordered structure with 0.34 nm lattice spacing was observed [28]. Furthermore, the SAED image (Figure 2c) of the LCF sheet indicated that the diffraction dots were fully indexed to the hexagonal graphite crystal structure [29], proving the highly graphitized crystalline structure of the LCF [30]. Therefore, it was claimed that the LCF is mainly composed of multi-layer graphene-like lignin-based carbon sheets with high thermal conductivity [3].…”
Section: Tem and Afm Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In comparison to the conventional X-ray diffraction facilities, synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction could achieve a higher quality powder diffraction patterns in terms of peak profile shape and FWHM resolution 33 , which enables better resolving capability as well as fitting results for both qualitative and quantitative measurements 32 . Therefore, the errors of d 002 and L C002 are very small and generally ignored in many related reports 33 35 . According to the previously reports 33 , 34 , the error of d 002 is estimated to be only about 10 −4 nm order magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%