2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2018.8486597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-Identification

Abstract: Online multi-object tracking is a fundamental problem in time-critical video analysis applications. A major challenge in the popular tracking-by-detection framework is how to associate unreliable detection results with existing tracks. In this paper, we propose to handle unreliable detection by collecting candidates from outputs of both detection and tracking. The intuition behind generating redundant candidates is that detection and tracks can complement each other in different scenarios. Detection results of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only apply the bounding box regressor and classifier to obtain new b k t and s k t , respectively. The MOTChallenge public benchmark includes multiple methods [30,9,13] which classify the given detections with trained neural networks, hence, we consider our processing of the given detections also as public.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We only apply the bounding box regressor and classifier to obtain new b k t and s k t , respectively. The MOTChallenge public benchmark includes multiple methods [30,9,13] which classify the given detections with trained neural networks, hence, we consider our processing of the given detections also as public.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not specifically provided, we followed the convention to also process raw DPM detections for MOT17. Note, several other public trackers already work on raw detections [30,9,13] and their own classification score and NMS procedure. Therefore, we consider the comparison with public trackers as fair.…”
Section: B2 Raw Dpm Detectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of fairness, performance comparison was separately carried out according to onshore or onboard datasets, because the results of some trackers can be biased due to camera motion. We discuss the comparison with state-of-the-art tracking methods, such as the framework of Markov decision process (MDP) [47], the combination of Kalman filter and Hungarian assignment algorithm (SORT) [48], the kernel correlation filter method (KCF) [49], the combination of Kalman filter and Kuhn-Munkres (POI) [50], SORT with deep association metric (DeepSORT) [19], and candidate selection combined with re-identification (MOTDT) [51].…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with these challenging issues, many researchers have established a wide variety of approaches to overcome this tracking task. With the advancement of object detection, the tracking-by-detection framework has been quite successful to track multiple humans in video [7]- [11]. There are effectively two tracking modes in this framework: online and offline tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offline tracking approaches [8], [10], [12] employ both past and future detections to globally formulate an optimization problem, which is unsuitably applied in real world applications. Online tracking approaches [4], [5], [7], [9], [11], [13] achieve the tracking estimates only relying on detections from past and current time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%