1995
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1995.1057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Manipulations Using Biosensor Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
92
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This need is realized in optical evanescent wave biosensors 2-7 which offer a versatile approach for the detection and characterization of biological molecules. The most commonly employed biosensors are surface plasmon resonance ͑SPR͒ biosensors [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with microfluidic sample handling. For hybridization studies and DNA detection, catcher molecules are immobilized to the sensor surface, and the binding process is monitored in real time after injection of a target analyte solution, detecting small local changes in refractive index at the sensor surface upon the biomolecular interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This need is realized in optical evanescent wave biosensors 2-7 which offer a versatile approach for the detection and characterization of biological molecules. The most commonly employed biosensors are surface plasmon resonance ͑SPR͒ biosensors [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with microfluidic sample handling. For hybridization studies and DNA detection, catcher molecules are immobilized to the sensor surface, and the binding process is monitored in real time after injection of a target analyte solution, detecting small local changes in refractive index at the sensor surface upon the biomolecular interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] The basis of the BIAcore TM system is the optical phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR), in which the angle of incident beam required for SPR changes depending on binding amount of guest molecules due to the change of refractive index and other factors near the Au surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successive injec tions of ethanol amine (35 /xl) and 0.1 m HC1 (5 /xl) were then performed at a flow of 5 ¡iVmin. The protocol used to immobilize dsDNA was adapted from the procedure described by Nilsson et a l (22). The sensor chip was first treated by injecting successively 40 /xl of N-ethyl-N'-(3- % of inhibition F ig .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%