2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time measurements of fluorescent aerosol particles in a living laboratory office under variable human occupancy and ventilation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Li et al , 35 who recently used the WIBS instrument to monitor indoor and outdoor air of a naturally ventilated bedroom, reported elevated indoor bioaerosol concentrations when the assessed room was occupied. Studies, such as those conducted in classrooms by Hospodsky et al 28 and Qian et al , 41 and in a living laboratory office by Patra et al , 42 corroborate our interpretation that human occupancy represented a major contributor to elevated indoor bioaerosol concentrations. More recently, Nieto-Caballero et al 37 conducted fluorescent aerosol cytometry in classrooms using the InstaScope (DetectionTek, Boulder, CO, USA), a direct-reading instrument operationally similar to the WIBS, and reported higher bioaerosol concentrations indoors than outdoors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, Li et al , 35 who recently used the WIBS instrument to monitor indoor and outdoor air of a naturally ventilated bedroom, reported elevated indoor bioaerosol concentrations when the assessed room was occupied. Studies, such as those conducted in classrooms by Hospodsky et al 28 and Qian et al , 41 and in a living laboratory office by Patra et al , 42 corroborate our interpretation that human occupancy represented a major contributor to elevated indoor bioaerosol concentrations. More recently, Nieto-Caballero et al 37 conducted fluorescent aerosol cytometry in classrooms using the InstaScope (DetectionTek, Boulder, CO, USA), a direct-reading instrument operationally similar to the WIBS, and reported higher bioaerosol concentrations indoors than outdoors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, two recent studies indicated that offbody skin lipids on indoor surfaces contribute significantly to O 3 reactivity and SOOP emissions in a residential building and a university classroom with low indoor O 3 concentrations (mean of 4−6 ppb). 29,53 Since the hard flooring in the LL office is cleaned frequently 54 and indoor O 3 concentrations were relatively high (typically 10−25 ppb), we do not expect a long persistence time scale for off-body skin lipids. Therefore, the ozonolysis of off-body skin lipids may not be an important SOOP source in routinely cleaned office environments with high outdoor air ventilation rates.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Particle emissions from PLA filaments and glue control run (PLA_Con_G) were recorded and characterized in real time by the WIBS. The WIBS has been deployed in a range of different outdoor and indoor campaigns [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], and interestingly has been utilized to understand emissions in medical environments, highlighting that human activities and tasks can significantly influence the air quality in indoor spaces [ 36 , 37 ] and that mitigation processes could be of use. This study represents the first use of the WIBS in monitoring particulate emissions released during 3D printing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%