2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccoins.2014.6868387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time massage differentiation with priority data service flows in VANET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Table 3, VANET applications can be divided into two classes of applications: real-time and non real-time, with each, with its own set of QoS requirements. Real-time applications are very sensitive to the end-to-end delay, jitter, and to the stability of path (Mu'azu et al, 2014). In this case the traffic performance is directly affected by the delay and the variation of delays.…”
Section: Qos Traffic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Table 3, VANET applications can be divided into two classes of applications: real-time and non real-time, with each, with its own set of QoS requirements. Real-time applications are very sensitive to the end-to-end delay, jitter, and to the stability of path (Mu'azu et al, 2014). In this case the traffic performance is directly affected by the delay and the variation of delays.…”
Section: Qos Traffic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement becomes particularly stringent in light of the advancements in autonomous driving technologies. Data packets that fail to meet the time constraints are discarded, leading to data loss [8]. In general, the vehicular networking domain follows the standardized framework established by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) known as the J2735 standard [9].…”
Section: Introduction 1preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queues are assigned different transmission priorities according to the types of applications that the queues support. The existing QoS schemes providing DiffServ can be divided into four categories of algorithms: media access control schemes [3,4], scheduling schemes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], routing schemes [12][13][14], and cross-layer control schemes [15][16][17]. However, in these works, after initial allocation, the priorities of the queues cannot be re-adjusted according to the real-time end-to-end situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%