2013
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time magnitude proxies for earthquake early warning in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar differences leading to an underestimation of peak ground acceleration have also been shown by Campbell and Bozorgnia (2006), who compared ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) derived from global data and GMPEs, which were devised for Europe and the Middle East by Ambraseys et al (2005). Hereafter, we use the local magnitude scaling relation of Sadeh et al (2014) instead of the global relations derived by Kuyuk and Allen (2013a). The missed event, flagged as teleseismic by ElarmS, is not actually a teleseismic event.…”
Section: Playbacks Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar differences leading to an underestimation of peak ground acceleration have also been shown by Campbell and Bozorgnia (2006), who compared ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) derived from global data and GMPEs, which were devised for Europe and the Middle East by Ambraseys et al (2005). Hereafter, we use the local magnitude scaling relation of Sadeh et al (2014) instead of the global relations derived by Kuyuk and Allen (2013a). The missed event, flagged as teleseismic by ElarmS, is not actually a teleseismic event.…”
Section: Playbacks Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We find that it is necessary to use a regionally developed magnitude estimation equation to relate maximum displacement P d with magnitude. The magnitude relation previously derived from an independent dataset (Sadeh et al, 2014) is an excellent fit between catalog magnitudes and ElarmS results for historical data with 3 < M D ≤ 5:3 and for several available RT M D > 3 events. We note that data used here do not include large magnitude earthquakes and therefore using the adjusted magnitude relations should be done with care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies show that while the correlation of individual τpmax or τ c with catalog magnitude is rather weak, that of event‐average is much stronger [ Allen and Kanamori , ; Brown et al , ; Lancieri et al , ; Sadeh et al , ]. Out of the 440 earthquakes analyzed in this study, 113 were recorded by four or more stations.…”
Section: The Log‐average Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%