2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01000-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time, interactive website for US-county-level COVID-19 event risk assessment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found a restricted number of platforms that are based on the "clinical data type" [60], including, for example, tools to monitor healthcare system capacity [61,62], to forecast different potential outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic based on several parameters [63] (see Figure 4, right), or to assess the risk level of attending events [64].…”
Section: The Case Of Genomic and Clinical Geo-oedvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found a restricted number of platforms that are based on the "clinical data type" [60], including, for example, tools to monitor healthcare system capacity [61,62], to forecast different potential outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic based on several parameters [63] (see Figure 4, right), or to assess the risk level of attending events [64].…”
Section: The Case Of Genomic and Clinical Geo-oedvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After estimating the risk levels for all event sizes, participants received veridical feedback about actual risk probabilities. Actual risk values were calculated based on the prevalence of active COVID-19 cases in each participant's county of residence35 . We calculated information prediction error as a measure of misestimation, the average discrepancy between estimated and actual risk values across event sizes6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reported daily incidence rate suffers from "ascertainment bias", i.e. because of a lack of testing it underestimates the true incidence by a factor of 5 or 10, although this bias has decreased over time [3]. Multiplying the daily incidence rate per 100,000 by such a factor before dividing by 100 thus provides a rough estimate of p.…”
Section: Methods I Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%