1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(99)00035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time implementation of on-line tool condition monitoring in turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many sensors were reported for tool condition monitoring system, namely; power sensors, vibration sensors, vision sensors, temperature sensors, touch sensors, force sensors, acoustic emission sensors, flow sensors and so on [4,2,5].The role of sensors and their signal interpretation capability is critical in any automation process. The processing and investigation of signals is significant because it will improve production capacity, reliability, reduced downtime and enhanced machining quality [6]. Byrne et al [7] described that 46% of the sensors monitoring systems were fully functional, 16% had limited functionality, 25% were non-functional owing to technical limitations and 13% were switched over to alternate systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many sensors were reported for tool condition monitoring system, namely; power sensors, vibration sensors, vision sensors, temperature sensors, touch sensors, force sensors, acoustic emission sensors, flow sensors and so on [4,2,5].The role of sensors and their signal interpretation capability is critical in any automation process. The processing and investigation of signals is significant because it will improve production capacity, reliability, reduced downtime and enhanced machining quality [6]. Byrne et al [7] described that 46% of the sensors monitoring systems were fully functional, 16% had limited functionality, 25% were non-functional owing to technical limitations and 13% were switched over to alternate systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods, on the other hand, employ parameters which are easier to measure, but the computational effort is usually very high (see, e.g. [46,73,75,130]). Table 1 (representation adapted from [36] and extended) lists different direct and indirect monitoring methods.…”
Section: Selection Of Relevant Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (see, e.g. [19,76,125,139,147,162]) describe the use of filters (such as band-or low-pass filters) in order to reduce the influence of disturbances like noise or other non-measurable contributions (see Section 1). However, the use of these techniques is not undisputed [184]: 'While relatively easy to implement, these techniques have not proven to be particularly effective at reducing the variations and tend to remove vital information.…”
Section: Digital Pre-processing Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resonance Theory-ART2 (Hong et al 2001), Kohonen Self-organizing Maps (Silva et al 1998), Time-Delay NN (Sick 1998), and Recurrent Neural Networks (Venkatesh et al 1997;Ghasempoor et al 1999;Kamarthi et al 2000) are also occasionally proposed. Recently, Wang et al (2008) proposed a TCM model developed using Fully Forward Connected NN which is a generalized version of MLP NN trained with the Extended Kalman filter algorithm, and Silva (2009) utilized a self-organized Spiking Neural Network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%