2008
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2007.910630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Implementation of a Discrete Nonlinearity Compensating Multiloops Control Technique for a 1.5-kW Three-Phase/Switch/Level Vienna Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of x W must be made considering the compromise between the control performance and the resulted control effort. It is worth mentioning that (16) indicates that the performance of PI feedback controller using the other design approach can also be improved by applying the proposed RECC. The proposed robust control scheme shown in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Robust Controlled Plantmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of x W must be made considering the compromise between the control performance and the resulted control effort. It is worth mentioning that (16) indicates that the performance of PI feedback controller using the other design approach can also be improved by applying the proposed RECC. The proposed robust control scheme shown in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Robust Controlled Plantmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It suffers from serious generator de-rating caused by highly distorted armature currents. To solve this problem, one can employ suited three-phase SMRs [14][15][16][17][18][19]. From the compromised considerations in switch number and control performance, the Vienna rectifier [14,[16][17][18][19] using only three switches is a better choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If higher efficiency is desired, the bridgeless DCM threephase SMR presented in [35] can be employed. To yield good line drawn current waveform tracking control with the minimum switch number, the three-phase three-switch (3P3SW) Vienna SMR [46,47] is a good choice. However, these two types of SMRs possess only AC-to-DC unidirectional power flow capability.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(b) [35], one diode drop is eliminated in each line-current path to increase the efficiency compared to 3P1SW SMR. c. Three-phase Vienna SMR [46,47] (Fig. 7(c)): it uses only three switches to achieve good current command tracking control.…”
Section: Operation and Schematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering proved advantages of multilevel converters such as low switching frequency, low harmonic distortion and high power conversion, they have been widely used in various industries [17][18][19]. Many multilevel rectifiers called bridgeless topologies are studied in the literature mainly including threelevel ones [20][21][22][23][24]. Some five-level topologies have been also introduced that are using hysteresis current control or another complicated controllers that makes switching frequency higher than standard levels results in higher power losses and lower efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%