2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2019.115729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time hand posture recognition using hand geometric features and Fisher Vector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that convolutional neural network has obvious advantages in basketball pose recognition, and the recognition effect is Table 1 lists the recognition results based on random forest [23] and SVM [24]). Especially for attitude recognition results based on improved Gaussian kernel function [25], pose1 and Pose5 are compared, the recognition effects of Gaussian kernel function are 98% and 96%, while the recognition rates of Pose1 and Pose5 described in this paper are about 98.16% and 97.42%, indicating that the convolutional network model has a better performance in attitude recognition. As the data set and posture selected are different from other recognition methods, the comparison can only be made on the average recognition rate.…”
Section: Eai Endorsed Transactions On Scalable Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It can be seen that convolutional neural network has obvious advantages in basketball pose recognition, and the recognition effect is Table 1 lists the recognition results based on random forest [23] and SVM [24]). Especially for attitude recognition results based on improved Gaussian kernel function [25], pose1 and Pose5 are compared, the recognition effects of Gaussian kernel function are 98% and 96%, while the recognition rates of Pose1 and Pose5 described in this paper are about 98.16% and 97.42%, indicating that the convolutional network model has a better performance in attitude recognition. As the data set and posture selected are different from other recognition methods, the comparison can only be made on the average recognition rate.…”
Section: Eai Endorsed Transactions On Scalable Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Non-Negative Matrix Factorization + Compressive Sensing [42] 87.8 AlexNet 'FC6' + PCA and SVM [43] 95 Set of Geometric Features + Fisher Vector and SVM [44] 95.3 DeReFNets [45] 96.14 Our method 97.44…”
Section: Methods Recognition Rate [%]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above accuracy was obtained with the combined features of Gaubor filter (GB) and Zernike moments (ZM) with a holdout CV test. Furthermore, a set of geometric features (SoGF) [ 27 ] such as angle, distance and curvature features, defined as local descriptors, was obtained from the contour of the hand gesture. Afterward, local descriptors were optimized using the Fisher vector, and the gestures were recognized using the support vector machine (SVM) classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%