2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icmech.2019.8722893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time External Contact Force Estimation and Localization for Collaborative Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make a fair comparison, the single contact situation is considered. The first algorithm is a proposed modification of particle filter on the graph (PFG) with 50 particles, the second one is a two-step optimization (TS) algorithm from [17], the third one is a one-layer feed-forward neural network with 100 neurons in a hidden layer (NN) and the fourth one is Direct-based optimization (DR) from [11]. The first two approaches use information about the robot surface and find a force inside a friction cone, the rest two approaches use a cylindrical approximation of a robot shape and assume an external force normal to the link.…”
Section: Contact Localization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make a fair comparison, the single contact situation is considered. The first algorithm is a proposed modification of particle filter on the graph (PFG) with 50 particles, the second one is a two-step optimization (TS) algorithm from [17], the third one is a one-layer feed-forward neural network with 100 neurons in a hidden layer (NN) and the fourth one is Direct-based optimization (DR) from [11]. The first two approaches use information about the robot surface and find a force inside a friction cone, the rest two approaches use a cylindrical approximation of a robot shape and assume an external force normal to the link.…”
Section: Contact Localization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both works, the authors examined forces acting to the normal of the robot surface constrained with a friction cone, which allowed to create more particles and decrease the computational load. In one of our previous works [17] the contact isolation was done using two-step optimization on the mesh surface of the robot KUKA iiwa 14.…”
Section: B Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to algorithms based on a particle filter [8], [10], our approach shows better runtime frequency since we do not spend time on resampling and projecting points on surface steps. The absence of a numerical optimization procedure inside like Direct in [6], [7], or QP in [11], [8], [10] also helps to improve run-time.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of our previous works [11] the contact isolation was done using two-step optimization on the mesh surface of the robot KUKA iiwa 14. In another work [12], we used a neural network trained to find a contact location in simulation and then transferred this network to the real robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on dynamics model of the robot manipulator, the external forces can be estimated by subtracting the inertial, Coriolis, gravity and friction terms from the input motor torque (Villagrossi et al , 2018; Popov and Klimchik, 2019; Wahrburg et al , 2014). In fact, model errors are inevitable, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the acceleration signals can also reduce the estimation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%