2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/smartgridcomm.2015.7436311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time event detection and feature extraction using PMU measurement data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of papers have explored datadriven methods for event detection and identification using PMU data. The previous work in this area can be roughly classified into two categories based on the number of PMUs used for model development: Class I: each PMU is treated independently and a single PMU data stream for each event is assigned as one data sample [3]- [6]. In [3], a signal processing-based methodology consisting of the swinging door trending algorithm and dynamic programming was proposed to detect power events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, a number of papers have explored datadriven methods for event detection and identification using PMU data. The previous work in this area can be roughly classified into two categories based on the number of PMUs used for model development: Class I: each PMU is treated independently and a single PMU data stream for each event is assigned as one data sample [3]- [6]. In [3], a signal processing-based methodology consisting of the swinging door trending algorithm and dynamic programming was proposed to detect power events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], an empirical model decomposition was utilized to assess power system events using wide-area post-event records. In [6], principal component analysis (PCA) was used to detect abnormal system behavior and adopt system visualizations. Class II: Instead of using data from a single PMU, several papers perform event identification tasks using multiple PMU measurements, which integrate interactive relationships of different PMUs [7]- [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non‐model based methods directly catch the instantaneous changes from the observed waveform, induced by the abrupt transition when the disturbance occurs. For example, principal component analysis has been used on PMU data to extract features and then obtain the disturbance information like type and intense [11]. In [12], support vector machine and wavelet analysis are adopted to identify the faulty‐section and faulty‐half.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools require considerable preprocessing of PMU data before visualising. In [6], the principal component analysis was done with PMU measurements to improve situational awareness about the chance of occurrence of any abnormal event. Grideye [7] is another situational awareness tool used for power system dynamics monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%