2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-009-0385-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time endovascular guidewire position simulation using shortest path algorithms

Abstract: The results indicate that the proposed technique yields reproducible and accurate guidewire positions within a short, clinically relevant time frame. These calculated positions may be useful in facilitating neurovascular interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each point i in G r , the closest point j in G s is determined as (4). when the corresponding points between G s and G r are established, we use the RMS distance to measure the difference between them. [14], we achieved 87 and 80 % improvements for the first and third phantoms under the same conditions, respectively. Furthermore, we obtained 91 % improvements for the second phantom under the condition with reduced graph construction complexity (i.e., fewer meshes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For each point i in G r , the closest point j in G s is determined as (4). when the corresponding points between G s and G r are established, we use the RMS distance to measure the difference between them. [14], we achieved 87 and 80 % improvements for the first and third phantoms under the same conditions, respectively. Furthermore, we obtained 91 % improvements for the second phantom under the condition with reduced graph construction complexity (i.e., fewer meshes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It generalizes quite natural results in 3D and provides high spatial resolution within a short time frame. Compared with previous studies [13,14,17], our graph construction requires markedly less time. Compared to [14], we achieved 87 and 80 % improvements for the first and third phantoms under the same conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations