2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1056-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Time Driver Anger Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, these two sets of features are used together to identify emotions and, as a result, the driver is warned according to the obtained emotional state. To deal with road rage, in [ 33 ] the authors propose a real-time detection of the driver’s road rage, mainly classifying the expression of anger in real time from a live video to send an alert. To capture the frontal face, a Haar cascade file is implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, these two sets of features are used together to identify emotions and, as a result, the driver is warned according to the obtained emotional state. To deal with road rage, in [ 33 ] the authors propose a real-time detection of the driver’s road rage, mainly classifying the expression of anger in real time from a live video to send an alert. To capture the frontal face, a Haar cascade file is implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…536 Engineering video analysis on driver anger recognition. Azman et al [13] applied Haar cascade classifier to locate face and recognize driver anger through support vector machine (SVM) in real time from a live video. Although 97% in-door accuracy was reported on 213 trained images with 5 fold cross-validation by Azman et al [13], overfit was the problem it may be faced with for such limited training images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azman et al [13] applied Haar cascade classifier to locate face and recognize driver anger through support vector machine (SVM) in real time from a live video. Although 97% in-door accuracy was reported on 213 trained images with 5 fold cross-validation by Azman et al [13], overfit was the problem it may be faced with for such limited training images. Gao et al [14] developed a real-time non-intrusive monitoring system using linear SVMs to detect anger and disgust of drivers, and achieved 85.5% accuracy for in-car scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%