2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1464-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Detection of Viroids Using Singleplex and Multiplex Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all three RNA isolation methods were proven valuable and could have different citrus applications, the consistency of the RNA quality isolated from citrus tissues with the semi-automated MagMAX ™ method, as previously reported for grapevine and lily (Osman et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2014) allowed its application in the high-throughput Citrus Nursery Stock Pest Cleanliness Program in California. Beyond the development and validation of the MagMAX ™ -RT-qPCR system, its successful implementation was supported by the integration of robotic pipetting systems and a series of standard operating procedures for swab testing and decontamination protocols allowing the technical personnel, regardless of experience level, to use the method with consistent results with little or no troubleshooting needs (Osman and Vidalakis, 2022;Vidalakis et al, 2022;Dang et al, 2022). This systems approach allowed the use of MagMAX ™ isolated nucleic acids not only for pathogen detection but also for high-throughput sequencing-based microbiome field and greenhouse studies for different citrus tissue types (i.e., stems, leaves, and roots) (Ginnan et al, 2018;Ginnan et al, 2020;Pagliaccia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although all three RNA isolation methods were proven valuable and could have different citrus applications, the consistency of the RNA quality isolated from citrus tissues with the semi-automated MagMAX ™ method, as previously reported for grapevine and lily (Osman et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2014) allowed its application in the high-throughput Citrus Nursery Stock Pest Cleanliness Program in California. Beyond the development and validation of the MagMAX ™ -RT-qPCR system, its successful implementation was supported by the integration of robotic pipetting systems and a series of standard operating procedures for swab testing and decontamination protocols allowing the technical personnel, regardless of experience level, to use the method with consistent results with little or no troubleshooting needs (Osman and Vidalakis, 2022;Vidalakis et al, 2022;Dang et al, 2022). This systems approach allowed the use of MagMAX ™ isolated nucleic acids not only for pathogen detection but also for high-throughput sequencing-based microbiome field and greenhouse studies for different citrus tissue types (i.e., stems, leaves, and roots) (Ginnan et al, 2018;Ginnan et al, 2020;Pagliaccia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal RT-qPCR reactions (Saponari et al, 2008;Vidalakis and Wang, 2013;Chambers et al, 2018;Vidalakis et al, 2022) were performed using the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and multiplex RT-qPCR reactions (Osman et al, 2015;Osman et al, 2017;Osman and Vidalakis, 2022) were carried out using the QuantStudio 12K Flex System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).RT-qPCR data was collected and analyzed with the Bio-Rad CFX Manager version 3.1 and the QuantStudio Flex software version 1.3, respectively.…”
Section: Rna Quality Assessment and Rt-qpcr Pathogen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, singleplex and multiplex reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and qPCR have drawn more attention and have been extensively utilized in detecting citrus pathogens due to their convenience and elevated levels of sensitivity and specificity [6,7,18,[25][26][27]. They both allow for the simultaneous detection of several pathogens in a single well and give more reliable and reproducible results through quantification compared to conventional PCR and other approaches [26,27]. Although qPCR-based techniques are sensitive, they are still some critical steps away from being practically applied in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although qPCR-based techniques are sensitive, they are still some critical steps away from being practically applied in the field. Sample preparation is one of the most challenging parts because it requires multiple procedures to extract high-quality nucleic acids from plant tissues [27,28]. Thus, the lack of appropriate sample preparation makes RT-qPCR/qPCR strategies unsuited for in-field diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%