The clinical value of assessing tumor glucose metabolism via F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging in oncology is well established; however, the poor spatial resolution of PET is a significant limitation especially for early stage lesions. An alternative technology is optical molecular imaging, which allows for subcellular spatial resolution and can be effectively used with topical contrast agents for imaging epithelial derived cancers. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential of optical molecular imaging of glucose metabolism to aid in early detection of oral neoplasia. Fluorescently labeled deoxyglucose (2-NBDG (2-[N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino]-2-deoxy-D-glucose)) was applied topically to tissue phantoms, fresh oral biopsies (n 5 32) and resected tumors specimens (n 5 2). High-resolution imaging results show that 2-NBDG can be rapidly delivered to oral epithelium using topical application. In normal epithelium, the uptake of 2-NBDG is limited to basal epithelial cells. In contrast, high-grade dysplasia and cancers show uptake of 2-NBDG in neoplastic cells throughout the lesion. Following 2-NBDG labeling, the mean fluorescence intensity of neoplastic tissue averages 3.7 times higher than that of matched nonneoplastic oral biopsies in samples from 20 patients. Widefield fluorescence images of 8-paired oral specimens were obtained pre and postlabeling with 2-NBDG. Prior to labeling, neoplastic samples showed significantly lower autofluorescence than nonneoplastic samples. The fluorescence of neoplastic samples increased dramatically after labeling; the differential increase in fluorescence was on average 30 times higher in neoplastic samples than in normal samples. Topical application of 2-NBDG can therefore provide image contrast in both widefield and high-resolution fluorescence imaging modalities, highlighting its potential in early detection of oral neoplasia. ' 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: molecular imaging; fluorescent glucose analogs; oral cancer; epithelial cancer Noninvasive, molecular-specific imaging has the potential to improve both the early detection of cancer and the evaluation of tumor response to therapeutic intervention. [1][2][3][4][5] Although molecular imaging technologies have contributed to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cancer development and progression 1,3 in animal model systems, there has been limited translation of these technologies to the clinical practice. 5,6 The clinical use of molecular imaging in cancer has primarily centered on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, using 18 F-FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) or 18 F-FLT (3 0 -Deoxy-3 0 -18 F-fluorothymidine) as contrast agents. PET imaging is now routinely used for staging and assessment of therapeutic response in cancer patients. [7][8][9] Cancer cells have increased rates of glucose metabolism relative to normal cells. [10][11][12] To support this increased glucose consumption, cancer cells over-express glucose transporters (GLUT) and hexokinase enzymes. In 18 FDG PET imaging...