2024
DOI: 10.1049/ipr2.13028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐time defect detection method based on YOLO‐GSS at the edge end of a transmission line

Chao Hou,
ZhiLei Li,
XueLiang Shen
et al.

Abstract: Combining edge devices with intelligent inspection for transmission lines can fulfill the demand for real‐time defect detection in the field. However, there has been limited research on algorithms suitable for edge devices with low computational power and memory, and the existing research primarily focuses on CPU optimization. To address these issues, this paper proposes a real‐time defect detection method for transmission line endpoints based on YOLO‐GSS (YOLOv8 with Mosaic‐9, G‐GhostNet, S‐FPN, and Spatial I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the performance of our proposed TL-Yolo, we compare our TL-Yolo with the state-of-the-art methods. The experimental results, from Table 4, show that our TL-Yolo outperforms the Faster R-CNN [39], SPP-Net [40], Yolov5 [41], Yolov7 [42], and Yolov8 [43] networks, which shows its improved detection accuracy and superior efficacy. Table 3 shows that Faster R-CNN and SPP-Net, as two-stage target detection algorithms, are not suitable for real-time target detection due to their high model complexity, large number of parameters and slow reasoning speed.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To validate the performance of our proposed TL-Yolo, we compare our TL-Yolo with the state-of-the-art methods. The experimental results, from Table 4, show that our TL-Yolo outperforms the Faster R-CNN [39], SPP-Net [40], Yolov5 [41], Yolov7 [42], and Yolov8 [43] networks, which shows its improved detection accuracy and superior efficacy. Table 3 shows that Faster R-CNN and SPP-Net, as two-stage target detection algorithms, are not suitable for real-time target detection due to their high model complexity, large number of parameters and slow reasoning speed.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%