Real-Time Decoding of Attentional States Using Closed-Loop EEG Neurofeedback

Abstract

Sustained attention is a cognitive ability to maintain task focus over extended periods of time (Mackworth, 1948; Chun, Golomb, & Turk-Browne, 2011). In this study, scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals were processed in real time using a 32 dry-electrode system during a sustained visual attention task. An attention training paradigm was implemented, as designed in DeBettencourt, Cohen, Lee, Norman, and Turk-Browne (2015) in which the composition of a sequence of blended images is updated based on the participant's decoded attentional level to a primed image category. It was hypothesized that a single neurofeedback training session would improve sustained attention abilities. Twenty-two participants were trained on a single neurofeedback session with behavioral pretraining and posttraining sessions within three consecutive days. Half of the participants functioned as controls in a double-blinded design and received sham neurofeedback. During the neurofeedback session, attentional states to primed categories were decoded in real time and used to provide a continuous feedback signal customized to each participant in a closed-loop approach. We report a mean classifier decoding error rate of 34.3% (chance [Formula: see text] 50%). Within the neurofeedback group, there was a greater level of task-relevant attentional information decoded in the participant's brain before making a correct behavioral response than before an incorrect response. This effect was not visible in the control group (interaction [Formula: see text]e[Formula: see text]4), which strongly indicates that we were able to achieve a meaningful measure of subjective attentional state in real time and control participants' behavior during the neurofeedback session. We do not provide conclusive evidence whether the single neurofeedback session per se provided lasting effects in sustained attention abilities. We developed a portable EEG neurofeedback system capable of decoding attentional states and predicting behavioral choices in the attention task at hand. The neurofeedback code framework is Python based and open source, and it allows users to actively engage in the development of neurofeedback tools for scientific and translational use.

Design of Cigarette QR Code Decoding System Based on STM32

“…e function looks for the pixel point as a variable, filters it, applies an edge gradient, verifies the edge, and transforms it to a width stream. Finally, the decoding algorithm extracts the QR code information, which is then sent to the storage system or display tool through RS232 connection [10][11]. Figure 4 shows the schematic design of the RS232 communication interface circuit.…”

Clustering of antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia based on functional connectivity from resting-state electroencephalography

“…The tests were selected to cover a broad range of cognitive domains and based on subgroup differences found in our previous work [ 26 ] and included: Verbal IQ (estimated based on vocabulary and similarities from WAIS-III), verbal memory (list learning from BACS), verbal fluency (F-words from BACS), mental flexibility (IED Total errors adjusted), and reaction time (RTI five choice reaction time). The features most important for the prediction were found by inspection of the feature weights estimated by the classifier [ 45 ]. The accuracy of the SVM was estimated using LOOCV.…”

Modeling The Effect of Background Sounds on Human Focus Using Brain Decoding Technology

“…Using electroencephalogram (EEG) sensor data, which contains electrical brain activity measured from the scalp (non-invasive) on the order of hundreds of measurements per second, many studies have established that it is possible to capture fast changes in human emotions and experience, such as stress (Perez-Valero et al, 2021), arousal (Faller et al, 2019), fatigue (Hu, 2017), and happiness (Lin et al, 2017). Several studies have similarly shown the ability to capture focus and attentional state changes, affirming that this information as well is captured in EEG sensor data (Hamadicharef et al, 2009(Hamadicharef et al, , 2009Jung et al, 1997;Micoulaud-Franchi et al, 2014;Tuckute et al, 2021). While brain decoding technology has been applied widely to study the effects of different types of stimuli (e.g visual, tactile, auditory) on human experience (Asif et al, 2019;Bhatti et al, 2016;Shahabi & Moghimi, 2016), as far as we know, it has not been applied to study the joint effects of sound and focus at the high temporal resolution needed to explain both phenomena.…”