2016
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2015.1133518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time cycle-slip detection and repair for BeiDou triple-frequency undifferenced observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observables of EWL and WL were still suffered from the ionospheric delay. Yao et al (2016) proposed to take the mean value of the residual ionospheric delay from several previous epochs to compensate for the current epoch; however, this was not applicable to severe ionospheric disturbances conditions between adjacent epochs. (Li et al (2018), Chang et al (2019) and Li et al (2019) put forward the method in which polynomial interpolation fitting was applied to the residual ionospheric delay of the previous epochs, and a prediction was made using extrapolation to compensate for the current epoch, but Runge phenomenon is easily generated at polynomial interpolation node.…”
Section: Basic Observable Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observables of EWL and WL were still suffered from the ionospheric delay. Yao et al (2016) proposed to take the mean value of the residual ionospheric delay from several previous epochs to compensate for the current epoch; however, this was not applicable to severe ionospheric disturbances conditions between adjacent epochs. (Li et al (2018), Chang et al (2019) and Li et al (2019) put forward the method in which polynomial interpolation fitting was applied to the residual ionospheric delay of the previous epochs, and a prediction was made using extrapolation to compensate for the current epoch, but Runge phenomenon is easily generated at polynomial interpolation node.…”
Section: Basic Observable Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sparsity makes it possible for FNN to fit for ionospheric delay of the neighboring epochs. Another problem exists in cycle slip processing is that the standard deviation of the code and carrier phase observables noise are usually set to 0.3 m and 0.003 m, respectively, so as to calculate the fixed detection thresholds (Wu et al, 2010;Yao et al, 2016), which may generate misjudgments or leakage judgments as measurement surroundings change. Therefore, to reduce the effect of extrapolation error and to adapt to other measurement noise including stochastic noise, multipath and so on, a reliable but simple detection threshold is promising.…”
Section: Basic Observable Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption cannot be valid under high ionospheric activities, e.g., strong ionospheric scintillation, or for the observations with low sampling rate, e.g., 30 s. Besides that, the method to eliminate the ionospheric bias may lead to the measured value being inaccurate and thus losing sensitivity to cycle slips with one cycle magnitude. A similar ionospheric prediction method was also applied by Yao et al [25], in which several previous carrier-phase observations without cycle slips are required to correct the ionospheric bias. This prediction method can only effectively predict the time-differenced ionospheric delay when the data epoch interval is no larger than 5 s [26].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In processing data, cycle-slip greater than 10 cycles will be easily discovered, whereas it is difficult to discover cycle-slip smaller than 10 cycles, particularly the small cycle-slip with 1 to 5 cycles. Polynomial fitting, high-order finite-difference, ionized layer remnant and wavelet analysis are routine methods for detecting cycle-slip [2][3][4][5][6]. Among these methods, polynomial fitting is inapplicable because it requires phase change rate and such measurement isn't accessible in some receivers, failing to detect small cycle-slip with one to five cycles [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%