“…Several reasons may be involved in the presence of this apparent antithesis. Interestingly, studies demonstrating more preserved comprehension capacity in children with DLD (Andreu et al, 2011(Andreu et al, , 2013(Andreu et al, , 2016Christou et al, 2020Christou et al, , 2021 are based on simpler structures of language, on eye-tracking methodology which does not require linguistic production to indicate the level of comprehension, and language is always supported by visual scenes. However, studies that demonstrate a more atypical comprehension (Coloma et al, 2013;Coloma & Pavez, 2017) do not have visual support, the comprehension is evidenced through verbal responses of the children with DLD, and the characteristics of the studied language are much closer to the real-world circumstances of day-to-day linguistic communication.…”