2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time changes in corticospinal excitability related to motor imagery of a force control task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, general anticipatory central mechanisms are thought to prepare the organism for the forthcoming effortful motor task, through the increased activity of the autonomic nervous system. MI of effortful action is also associated with increased corticospinal excitability (MEPs amplitude), as reported in TMS studies involving MI of finger (Helm et al, 2015), wrist (Tatemoto et al, 2017), and foot (Kato & Kanosue, 2017)…”
Section: Text 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, general anticipatory central mechanisms are thought to prepare the organism for the forthcoming effortful motor task, through the increased activity of the autonomic nervous system. MI of effortful action is also associated with increased corticospinal excitability (MEPs amplitude), as reported in TMS studies involving MI of finger (Helm et al, 2015), wrist (Tatemoto et al, 2017), and foot (Kato & Kanosue, 2017)…”
Section: Text 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this regard, increasing kinematic information has been previously associated with increased muscular effort information conveyed during action observation (Proverbio et al, 2009). Previous TMS studies have reported enhanced corticospinal excitability during MI of finger (Helm et al, 2015), wrist (Tatemoto et al, 2017), and foot (Kato et al, 2017) movements requiring increasing effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As they acquire SMR control, such imagery tends to drop away (Wolpaw and McFarland, 2004 ). Motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability (Kasai et al, 1997 ; Rossini et al, 1999 ; Stinear and Byblow, 2004 ; Stinear et al, 2006a , b ; Bakker et al, 2008 ; Kang et al, 2011 ; Gündüz and Kiziltan, 2015 ; Kato et al, 2015 ; Im et al, 2016 ; Tatemoto et al, 2017 ) and resting motoneuron excitability (Gündüz and Kiziltan, 2015 ). Studies of the impact of motor imagery on the H-reflex are less consistent in their results (Oishi et al, 1994 ; Abbruzzese et al, 1996 ; Yahagi et al, 1996 ; Bonnet et al, 1997 ; Kasai et al, 1997 ; Hashimoto and Rothwell, 1999 ; Hale et al, 2003 ; Patuzzo et al, 2003 ; Cowley et al, 2008 ; Aoyama and Kaneko, 2011 ; Jarjees and Vuckovic, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten participants participated in both experiments. Numerous similar studies included similar sample sizes (10–15 participants) and employed strict methodology (Aoyama et al, 2016; Bouguetoch et al, 2020; Cengiz et al, 2018; Grospretre et al, 2020; Kato & Kanosue, 2018; Tatemoto et al, 2017). All participants were right‐handed with no history of neurological or psychiatric disease and were screened for any contraindications of TMS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%