2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time automatic lameness detection based on back posture extraction in dairy cattle: Shape analysis of cow with image processing techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective measurement of gait patterns in research studies is mainly based on 2 methods: (1) kinematic (changes in the position of the body segments during a specified time) gait analysis (Flower et al, 2005), such as high-speed cinematography with the cow on a treadmill (Schmid et al, 2009), image-processing techniques (Poursaberi et al, 2010;Viazzi et al, 2013), or accelerometers (Pastell et al, 2009;Alsaaod et al, 2015); and (2) kinetic (force applied to the body) gait analysis using 1-or 3-dimensional ground reaction force systems (Rajkondawar et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2010;Thorup et al, 2014) or pressure-sensitive walkways (Van Nuffel et al, 2009;Maertens et al, 2011). One of the drawbacks of some of these methods is that they are expensive or difficult to apply in clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective measurement of gait patterns in research studies is mainly based on 2 methods: (1) kinematic (changes in the position of the body segments during a specified time) gait analysis (Flower et al, 2005), such as high-speed cinematography with the cow on a treadmill (Schmid et al, 2009), image-processing techniques (Poursaberi et al, 2010;Viazzi et al, 2013), or accelerometers (Pastell et al, 2009;Alsaaod et al, 2015); and (2) kinetic (force applied to the body) gait analysis using 1-or 3-dimensional ground reaction force systems (Rajkondawar et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2010;Thorup et al, 2014) or pressure-sensitive walkways (Van Nuffel et al, 2009;Maertens et al, 2011). One of the drawbacks of some of these methods is that they are expensive or difficult to apply in clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collection of some of the physiological measurements require the animal to be restrained, compromising the ability to interpret changes as painful as opposed to stressful. Other pain assessment systems have been developed in response to this, and they rely on monitoring short-term behaviors such as vocalizations [96], escape attempts [97], lameness [94], or posture changes [57,98] where animals try to adopt a position that limits the pain experienced. Many of these indicators are not pain specific and can be seen in response to other affective states such as fear or stress, or even positive states such as joy.…”
Section: Assessing Pain In Farm Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group researcher reported that fully automated lameness detection system using load cells (Rajkondawar, U., et al [35], Pastell, M., et al [36], Liu, J., et al [37]). Another group researcher is also study about cattle lameness detection system using computer vision [38][39][40][41][42]. The system report lame cattle in need of treatment must be separated from the herd automatically.…”
Section: Health Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%