2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-020-01716-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time assessment of video images for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invasion depth using artificial intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with ME were 89%, 71%, and 95% for the AI system and 84%, 42%, and 97% for expert endoscopists. Although the performance of AI was not perfect, it appeared to outperform endoscopists 32 …”
Section: The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In the Esophagusmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with ME were 89%, 71%, and 95% for the AI system and 84%, 42%, and 97% for expert endoscopists. Although the performance of AI was not perfect, it appeared to outperform endoscopists 32 …”
Section: The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In the Esophagusmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The accuracy was found to be 91.0%, with a performance similar to 16 experienced endoscopists. Shimamoto et al 41 . developed an AI system to distinguish EP‐SM1 from SM2‐3 in superficial ESCC using 102 video images consisting of two types: non‐ME with WLI and ME with NBI/blue‐laser imaging.…”
Section: Ai For Diagnosis Of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model achieved a higher sensitivity for SCC detection and higher accuracy for SCC characterization from normal tissue than endoscopic experts. Two studies by Nakagawa et al [ 31 ] and Shimamoto et al [ 32 ] aimed at developing models that predicted esophageal malignancy depth utilizing a DL model based on a CNN with a belief-propagation decoder using independent validation datasets. These models achieved an accuracy of 89.2% and 91% in predicting invasion depth, with sensitivities of 70.8% and 90.1%, and specificities of 94.4% and 95.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Upper Gastrointestinal Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%