2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time assessment of high-intensity focused ultrasound heating and cavitation with hybrid optoacoustic ultrasound imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed a uniform distribution of heat across the focal region in both cell configurations. However, approximately 12.5 % higher maximum intensity was recorded at the same applied pressure in spheroids than in monolayers, which increased as the applied pressure was also increased (47). This can potentially be due to an additional absorption coefficient and specific heat capacity offered by the hydrogel to spheroids (Table 1), causing the latter to absorb much more heat than the hydrogel-lacking monolayers, while only leading to slow increase in temperature.…”
Section: Monolayer Vs Spheroid Ablation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Results showed a uniform distribution of heat across the focal region in both cell configurations. However, approximately 12.5 % higher maximum intensity was recorded at the same applied pressure in spheroids than in monolayers, which increased as the applied pressure was also increased (47). This can potentially be due to an additional absorption coefficient and specific heat capacity offered by the hydrogel to spheroids (Table 1), causing the latter to absorb much more heat than the hydrogel-lacking monolayers, while only leading to slow increase in temperature.…”
Section: Monolayer Vs Spheroid Ablation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results showed a uniform distribution of heat across the focal region in both cell configurations. However, approximately 12.5% higher maximum intensity was recorded at the same applied pressure in spheroids than in monolayers, which increased as the applied pressure was also increased [60]. This can potentially be due to an additional absorption coefficient and specific heat capacity offered by the hydrogel to spheroids (Table 1), causing the latter to absorb much more heat than the hydrogel-lacking monolayers while only lead-ing to a slow increase in temperature.…”
Section: Monolayer Vs Spheroid Ablation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The thermal effect causes a local temperature rise that leads to irreversible cell death through coagulative necrosis. The mechanical effect, also called cavitation, causes irreversible damage by mechanically disrupting cell membrane permeability and altering the structure of cells [ 3 ]. In the past several decades, HIFU has been clinically used to treat bone, breast, kidney, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancer [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]; uterine fibroids [ 10 ]; and cardiac arrhythmias [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, US imaging has relatively low-imaging contrast, sensitivity, and specificity for non-invasive detection [ 29 ]. Although US imaging can also provide thermometry by measuring local changes in speed of sound, its sensitivity and accuracy of thermometry are relatively low becuase of the complex physical nature of acoustic tissue properties and mechanisms of cavitation [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%