2014 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-WideBand (ICUWB) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icuwb.2014.6958994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time, anchor-free node tracking using ultrawideband range and odometry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [10], [13], [20], the weighting scheme is simplified by setting a unit value to each measurement when the noise measurement model is not available. This causes robustness issue for localization when the measurement error is significant.…”
Section: A Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [10], [13], [20], the weighting scheme is simplified by setting a unit value to each measurement when the noise measurement model is not available. This causes robustness issue for localization when the measurement error is significant.…”
Section: A Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the Range-Odometry based MDS method proposed by [20] has been selected to apply our proposed adaptive weighting scheme. The method is summarized in this section.…”
Section: B Range-odometry Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach only needs a small number of assumptions and keeps the reference frame through time steps. Therefore, the authors extended this work to make available a real-time tracking system [260]. In this system, the results show that MDSbased approaches are better than the EKF method.…”
Section: Reference-free Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of pulses per frame is N s = 20480 and the scan length is N = 1920 samples. Note that the time required to collect samples for a scan is approximately9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p l (t) may account for distortions due to antennas, reflections, frequencydependent RCS of the target, and filtering in the receiver front-end 9. The actual scan duration is slightly higher as an inter-frame period is present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%