2002
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2002.800545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time algorithms and architectures for multiuser channel estimation and detection in wireless base-station receivers

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents algorithms and architecture designs that can meet real-time requirements of multiuser channel estimation and detection in future code-division multiple-access-based wireless base-station receivers. Sophisticated algorithms proposed to implement multiuser channel estimation and detection make their real-time implementation difficult on current digital signal processor-based receivers. A maximum-likelihood based multiuser channel estimation scheme requiring matrix inversions is redes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For AWGN, the ML approach of our scheme and the MMSE approach of RLS lead to the same solution and hence, have similar BER performance [16]. However, our scheme is more suited towards a real-time implementation than RLS.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For AWGN, the ML approach of our scheme and the MMSE approach of RLS lead to the same solution and hence, have similar BER performance [16]. However, our scheme is more suited towards a real-time implementation than RLS.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The comparisons of our scheme with recursive least squares (RLS) has been shown in [16]. For AWGN, the ML approach of our scheme and the MMSE approach of RLS lead to the same solution and hence, have similar BER performance [16].…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, this optimal MUD is prohibitively complex for real-time implementation; its complexity increases exponentially with the number of users. Therefore, over the last two decades, research in this area has focused on several uplink sub-optimal MUD solutions [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] whose design objective is to reach a good tradeoff between performance and complexity: (1) to combat MAI and ISI in order to reliably detect information data of possibly a larger number of active users; while (2) maintaining a complexity permitting a real-time implementation for this maximum number of users. This implementation complexity issue explains the reason why the Rake receiver is still present in 3G base stations [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, even though many sub-optimal MUD methods have been proposed, most of these techniques show high computational complexity and can not be feasible in real-time on commercial baseband processors used in the BS. Nevertheless, some work has been conducted regarding real-time implementation aspect of MUDs [16,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%