2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time ‘Actor-Critic’ Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EAST [22] 0.638 -0.629 159 PTAV [12] 0.663 0.581 0.635 25 ACT [5] 0.657 -0.625 30 RT-MDNet [24] --0.650 46 Ours 0.693 0.653 0.687 120 Table 3. Comparison with state-of-the-art real-time trackers on OTB dataset.…”
Section: Siamfc-based Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EAST [22] 0.638 -0.629 159 PTAV [12] 0.663 0.581 0.635 25 ACT [5] 0.657 -0.625 30 RT-MDNet [24] --0.650 46 Ours 0.693 0.653 0.687 120 Table 3. Comparison with state-of-the-art real-time trackers on OTB dataset.…”
Section: Siamfc-based Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the success plot reports the percentages of frames where the overlap between the predicted and the ground truth bounding boxes is higher than a series of given ratios. We compare our algorithm with twelve state-of-theart trackers including nine real-time deep trackers (ACT [5], StructSiam [44], SiamRPN [22], ECO-HC [7], PTAV [13], CFNet [35], Dsiam [16], LCT [27], SiameFC [3]) and three traditional trackers (Staple [2], DSST [8], KCF [18]). Figure 6 illustrates the precision and success plots of all compared trackers over OTB-2015, which shows the proposed tracker achieves very good performance (merely a slightly lower than ECO-HC in success).…”
Section: Evaluation On the Otb-2015 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also adopt both success and precision plots to evaluate different trackers (the same evaluation protocol as OTB-2015). We compare our algorithm with eleven trackers, including ACT [5], PTAV [13], Dsiam [16], SiameFC [3], HCFT [26], FCNT [36], STCT [37], BACF [15], SRDCF [9], KCF [18] and MEEM [41]. Figure 7 shows that our tracker achieves the best results in terms of both precision and success criterion.…”
Section: Evaluation On the Tc-128 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [39], authors presented a tracker which, at every time step, decides to shift the current bounding box while remaining on the same frame, to stop the shift process and move to the next frame, to update on-line the weights of the model or to re-initialize the tracker if the target is considered lost. Finally, [3] proposed to substitute the discrete action framework of [52] with continuous actions, thus performing just a single action at every frame.…”
Section: Deep Rl For Visual Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the t-th frame, the agent is provided with the state s t and outputs the continuous action a t which consists in the relative motion of the target object, i.e. it indicates how its bounding box, which is known in frame t − 1, should move to enclose the target in the frame t. This approach is similar to the MDP formulation given by Chen et al [3], however we propose different definitions for the states, actions and rewards.…”
Section: Problem Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%