2012 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/apccas.2012.6419104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time accelerometer-based gait recognition using adaptive windowed wavelet transforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the classification results, performance of the neural network on the proposed event-based dynamic segmentation is higher (>95%) than that obtained with the relevant fixed window sizes. While a number of studies encouraged the use of fixed window size segmentation for activity recognition problem, the results obtained in this work seem to go in the other direction, as these results are better than the ones obtained by Hong et al [6] (93.78%), Lee et al [8] (86-92%, with 10 s of window size) and Wang et al (93.3%) [7]. Fixed window size can thus be sub-optimal when activities last for significantly shorter or longer time periods than the window length, or when activity durations vary over time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the classification results, performance of the neural network on the proposed event-based dynamic segmentation is higher (>95%) than that obtained with the relevant fixed window sizes. While a number of studies encouraged the use of fixed window size segmentation for activity recognition problem, the results obtained in this work seem to go in the other direction, as these results are better than the ones obtained by Hong et al [6] (93.78%), Lee et al [8] (86-92%, with 10 s of window size) and Wang et al (93.3%) [7]. Fixed window size can thus be sub-optimal when activities last for significantly shorter or longer time periods than the window length, or when activity durations vary over time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In the first class of techniques, the signal is divided into consecutive windows of fixed length. In the case of locomotion activities, used lengths lie in the range (1-10) s [4,5,6,7,8], and the presence of overlapping between consecutive windows is usually limited to 50%. One limitation of this approach is that problems can arise if an activity lasts for shorter or longer time periods than the pre-defined window length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency domain approaches focus on the frequency content of successive windows of measurements based on short-term Fourier transform (STFT) [ 30 ], FFT [ 31 ], and continuous/discrete wavelet transforms (CWT/DWT) [ 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], and can generally achieve high accuracy, but suffer from either resolution issues [ 34 ] or computational overheads [ 35 ]. In [ 31 ], steps are identified by extracting frequency domain features in acceleration data through FFT, and the accuracy of was achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the known techniques, the sliding window approach is the most widely employed [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], being regarded as the best approach for research given its simplicity and stability, and a wide range of window lengths has been used in past studies. Windows as short as 0.5 s and 0.8 s were used to recognize walking, jogging, and going up or down the stairs [ 46 ], whereas a window of 1 s with a decision tree (DT) [ 47 ] was used to classify stationary, walking, running, and biking motion modes. Additionally, with a neural network [ 48 ], a window of 2 s was adopted to classify the motion modes of walking, upstairs and downstairs movement, running, and sitting with varying poses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%