2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Space Mapping of Surface Trap States in CIGSe Nanocrystals Using 4D Electron Microscopy

Abstract: Surface trap states in copper indium gallium selenide semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs), which serve as undesirable channels for nonradiative carrier recombination, remain a great challenge impeding the development of solar and optoelectronics devices based on these NCs. In order to design efficient passivation techniques to minimize these trap states, a precise knowledge about the charge carrier dynamics on the NCs surface is essential. However, selective mapping of surface traps requires capabilities beyond … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(158 reference statements)
0
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the charge carrier dynamics at MoS 2 /g‐C 3 N 4 interfaces and correlate it to the photodetection performance, we employed femtosecond transient absorption (fs‐TA) spectroscopy with broadband capability. It is worth pointing out that TA spectroscopy has proven to be a critical method to study such interfacial carrier dynamics . Here, we used it to monitor the carrier dynamics at the interface between MoS 2 and g‐C 3 N 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the charge carrier dynamics at MoS 2 /g‐C 3 N 4 interfaces and correlate it to the photodetection performance, we employed femtosecond transient absorption (fs‐TA) spectroscopy with broadband capability. It is worth pointing out that TA spectroscopy has proven to be a critical method to study such interfacial carrier dynamics . Here, we used it to monitor the carrier dynamics at the interface between MoS 2 and g‐C 3 N 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface sensitivity can be further enhanced by reducing the accelerating voltage of the electron beam [47]. This high surface sensitivity enabled, for example, the study of surface states and surface morphology and their effects in photocarrier recombination in indium gallium nitride (InGaN) nanowires [31,49], multinary copper indium gallium selenide (CIGSe) nanocrystals [32] and CdSe [50]. When used in the environmental SEM mode, SUEM can also study photocarrier dynamics on sample surfaces in the presence of water vapor and other gases [29].…”
Section: Recent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUEM experiences the same charging issue as the normal SEM, so in principle is not suitable to study electrically insulating materials, although the environmentalmode SUEM [29] can be a potential solution. SUEM has been utilized to image ultrafast photocarrier dynamics on the surface of a wide range of materials, including crystalline semiconductors [28,30], semiconducting nanowires [31] and nanocrystals [32], amorphous semiconductors [33], semiconductor p-n junctions [34] and two-dimensional materials [35], and these applications have resulted in intriguing observations such as ballistic transport of photocarriers across a p-n junction [34], superdiffusion of photocarriers in heavily-doped semiconductors [30] and spontaneous spatial separation of electrons and holes in amorphous semiconductors [33]. Whereas there has been an abundance of recent reviews of ultrafast electron microscopy [8,9,[36][37][38], we dedicate this article specifically to SUEM, with an emphasis on the current understanding of various physical processes that contribute to the contrast images observed in SUEM from a users' perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the contrast should be bright in the SEs timeresolved difference images, as detected for the clean surfaces of CdSe and Si. [18][19] However, a dark image contrast is also observed after surface excitation in a number of photovoltaic materials, including GaAs, 21 CIGSe 22 and InGaN NWs [22][23] . This dark contrast suggests that the density of SEs decreases after optical excitation (fewer SEs escape from the material surface).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%