1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.44.13063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-space implementation of nonlocal pseudopotentials for first-principles total-energy calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, one finds that with pseudopotential calculations the equilibrium structure is well converged at a somewhat lower value of E cut wf than necessary for the energy. A localized real-space representation 43 of the pseudopotentials summarized in Sec. II A is used; matrix elements of the nonlocal pseudopotential operator are evaluated much faster in real space for large systems, but this procedure is slightly inaccurate with realistic parameter settings.…”
Section: Ionic Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, one finds that with pseudopotential calculations the equilibrium structure is well converged at a somewhat lower value of E cut wf than necessary for the energy. A localized real-space representation 43 of the pseudopotentials summarized in Sec. II A is used; matrix elements of the nonlocal pseudopotential operator are evaluated much faster in real space for large systems, but this procedure is slightly inaccurate with realistic parameter settings.…”
Section: Ionic Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a compromise should involve an increase in the support region radii of our functions by a small factor. This situation is similar to the calculation of the integrals of the nonlocal projectors of pseudopotentials in real space with the method of King-Smith et al [16] which requires an increase of the core radii by a factor of 1.5 to 2. For example, if we consider two carbon valence pseudoorbitals of support radius 6.0a 0 and with d = 5.0a 0 and translate them both in a certain lattice vector direction over a full grid spacing, the maximum variation in the value of the integral with the FFT box method is 8.28×10 −6 Hartree.…”
Section: Tests and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime several improvements are being introduced in the pseudopotential code, as for example a real-space projector method [35] to evaluate the pseudopotential matrix-elements (which brings a speed up between a factor of 2 and 3), and ultrasoft pseudopotentials [36] (which brings a speed up by another factor of 2). Altogether, for the chosen benchmark system the new version of the plane-wave pseudopotential code, fhi99md, is about a factor of 20 faster, without loss in accuracy [37].…”
Section: Comparing the Computationally Costs Fp-lapw And Pseudopotentmentioning
confidence: 99%