2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.107.104517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-space BCS-BEC crossover in FeSe monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FeSe resides in the crossover regime between weak coupling Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and strong coupling Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC), for the large pairing gap magnitude and the relatively small Fermi energy. Given the increasing experimental supports for the presence of fluctuated Cooper pairs in the monolayer FeSe, the lattice-scale varied pairing gap with the particle–hole asymmetry observed here signals the preformed pairing, which interpreted the wide resistivity transition. In contrast to the missing pseudogap feature in bulk FeSe, which has been attributed to the multiorbital screening effect, , the pseudogap-like state in the monolayer FeSe emerges upon exclusive M-centered electron pockets crossing the Fermi surface (the Γ-centered hole bands shift downward to approximately −80 meV below E F ) . Momentum resolution is requisite to disclose the BCS-BEC crossover mechanism in multiband systems, e.g., quasi-particle interference spectrum and ARPES.…”
Section: Electronic and Pairing Modulation In The Monolayer Fesementioning
confidence: 80%
“…FeSe resides in the crossover regime between weak coupling Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and strong coupling Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC), for the large pairing gap magnitude and the relatively small Fermi energy. Given the increasing experimental supports for the presence of fluctuated Cooper pairs in the monolayer FeSe, the lattice-scale varied pairing gap with the particle–hole asymmetry observed here signals the preformed pairing, which interpreted the wide resistivity transition. In contrast to the missing pseudogap feature in bulk FeSe, which has been attributed to the multiorbital screening effect, , the pseudogap-like state in the monolayer FeSe emerges upon exclusive M-centered electron pockets crossing the Fermi surface (the Γ-centered hole bands shift downward to approximately −80 meV below E F ) . Momentum resolution is requisite to disclose the BCS-BEC crossover mechanism in multiband systems, e.g., quasi-particle interference spectrum and ARPES.…”
Section: Electronic and Pairing Modulation In The Monolayer Fesementioning
confidence: 80%
“…18 Different substrates have also been used to tune the band edge of FeSe monolayers; a FeSe monolayer grown on trilayer graphene (TLG) features Δ/E F = 0.3. 40 Bulk FeSe exhibits uniquely tiny hole (E F ∼ 10 meV) and electron pockets (E F ∼ 3 meV) at the Fermi surface, 14 and Δ = 2.3 or 1.5 meV for the hole or electron band, respectively. 41 Thus, Δ/E F ∼ 0.23 or 0.5 for the hole or electron band of bulk FeSe.…”
Section: * =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the upward triangles in Figure h refer to YBa 2 Cu 3 O x , leftward triangles to La 2‑x Sr x CuO 4 , and rightward triangles to Tl 2 Ba 2 Ca 2 Cu 3 O 10 , Bi 2 Sr 2 CaCu 2 O 8 , Bi 2 Sr 2 Ca 2 Cu 3 O 10 , Tl 2 Ba 2 CaCu 2 O 8 . In iron-based superconductors, the effects of chemical doping have been explored, and Δ/ E F of bulk Fe 1+x Te 0.6 Se 0.4 can be raised from 0.16 to 0.50 by reducing x . Different substrates have also been used to tune the band edge of FeSe monolayers; a FeSe monolayer grown on trilayer graphene (TLG) features Δ/ E F = 0.3 . Bulk FeSe exhibits uniquely tiny hole ( E F ∼ 10 meV) and electron pockets ( E F ∼ 3 meV) at the Fermi surface, and Δ = 2.3 or 1.5 meV for the hole or electron band, respectively .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between these two limits, namely, the BCS-BEC crossover regime, incoherent fermion pairing occurs due to the Fermi surface instability at a pairing temperature T p , forming the so-called pseudogap phase, while superfluidity of coherent pairs occurs at a lower temperature T c . Given the characteristic superconducting gap magnitude Δ ~15–20 meV and the relatively small Fermi energy E F ~56 meV, one-unit-cell (1 UC) FeSe on SrTiO 3 (001) resides in the BCS-BEC crossover regime 5 7 . In coincidence with the crossover scenario, the hitherto observed zero-resistance temperature of 20–30 K is much lower than the pairing temperature T p of 50–83 K, as disclosed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) investigations 8 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%