2015
DOI: 10.1680/bren.13.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real road load compared to standard load for Brazilian bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Federal Highway Administration of USA (2015) considers some scenarios for compound vehicles as depicted in Figure 1. On the other hand, Melo (2018) comments that the Brazilian Traffic Code permits the following kinds of trucks and trolleys as depicted in Figure 2 The effect of real vehicles over bridges in context of the Brazilian reality is addressed by Stucchi and Luchi (2014). They considered the probability occurrence of traffic jam with aleatory distribution of vehicles over the bridge.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of a Highway Bridge Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Federal Highway Administration of USA (2015) considers some scenarios for compound vehicles as depicted in Figure 1. On the other hand, Melo (2018) comments that the Brazilian Traffic Code permits the following kinds of trucks and trolleys as depicted in Figure 2 The effect of real vehicles over bridges in context of the Brazilian reality is addressed by Stucchi and Luchi (2014). They considered the probability occurrence of traffic jam with aleatory distribution of vehicles over the bridge.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of a Highway Bridge Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of real vehicles over bridges in context of the Brazilian reality is addressed by Stucchi and Luchi (2014). They considered the probability occurrence of traffic jam with aleatory distribution of vehicles over the bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, an important work for determining the traffic load model was that by Stucchi and Luchi [30], who simulated the traffic in grid concrete bridges and in box girder section, with beams span varying between 30 m and 200 m, in congestion situation, using data collected from road scale weighing using gumbel distribution and a return period of 140 years. In Europe, the analyses performed by O'Brien and Enright [25] and Sivakumar [29] used moving weighing to model load on bridges.…”
Section: Calibration Of the International Standards For Prestressed C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So that this study could be compared to Caprani, Mayer and Siamphukdee [5], we have to convert the action model value into annual exceedance probability. For the conversion, the maximum moment due to the traffic loading is considered to follow a type-1 Gumbel distribution, as presented by Obrien et al [24] and and Stucchi and Luchi [30], and the value of the coefficient of variation (CV) is 0.18, as presented in Rakoczy and Nowak [28]. The cumulative probability density function of a type-1 Gumbel distribution is:…”
Section: Conversion Of the Traffic Load Model Value Into Annual Excee...mentioning
confidence: 99%