2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02839-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-life experience: sensitivity and specificity of nasal and saliva samples for COVID-19 diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a real life experience, 3 different samples (taken by the healthcare worker, by the patient and saliva) performance compared and the sensitivity of the three samples in the diagnosis of the COVID-19 was 100%, 98.7%, and 96.1%, respectively. The authors conclude these results are accepted to be accurate (24).…”
Section: Covid-19 Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In a real life experience, 3 different samples (taken by the healthcare worker, by the patient and saliva) performance compared and the sensitivity of the three samples in the diagnosis of the COVID-19 was 100%, 98.7%, and 96.1%, respectively. The authors conclude these results are accepted to be accurate (24).…”
Section: Covid-19 Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 61%