2002
DOI: 10.1155/s1025583402000127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real interpolation with logarithmic functors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We omit the proof since it can be done as in [16,Theorems 6.3,6.5, and 6.6], see also [20]. Now, we are able to consider the reiteration problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We omit the proof since it can be done as in [16,Theorems 6.3,6.5, and 6.6], see also [20]. Now, we are able to consider the reiteration problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were established in [6,9,[11][12][13]15,17,21] for the parameters 0 ≤ θ 0 < θ 1 ≤ 1, and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 1; similar theorems were proven in [18,20] for the spaces (X θ 0 ,b 0 ,E 0 , X θ 1 ,b 1 ,E 1 ) θ,b,E . In [1] sharp reiteration theorems were proven when 0 ≤ θ 0 < θ 1 ≤ 1 and θ ∈ {0, 1}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, to get a meaningful definition they need to insert powers of the function g(t) = 1 + | log t| (see, for example, [18] or [19]) or, more generally, certain slowly varying function (see [1], [22]). We do not use here any weight of these kinds but the suitable term with the supremum which corresponds to the norm of the Gagliardo completion of A j in A 0 + A 1 (j = 0, 1) (see [3]).…”
Section: Limiting K-spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%