2012
DOI: 10.1021/ci300084j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real External Predictivity of QSAR Models. Part 2. New Intercomparable Thresholds for Different Validation Criteria and the Need for Scatter Plot Inspection

Abstract: The evaluation of regression QSAR model performance, in fitting, robustness, and external prediction, is of pivotal importance. Over the past decade, different external validation parameters have been proposed: Q(F1)(2), Q(F2)(2), Q(F3)(2), r(m)(2), and the Golbraikh-Tropsha method. Recently, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC, Lin), which simply verifies how small the differences are between experimental data and external data set predictions, independently of their range, was proposed by our group … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
268
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
268
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performances in estimation of the top-three models with highest goodness-of-fit were assessed using the measures presented in Table 4 [23][24][25]. …”
Section: Assessment Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances in estimation of the top-three models with highest goodness-of-fit were assessed using the measures presented in Table 4 [23][24][25]. …”
Section: Assessment Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable thresholds used in this study for different validation criteria have been rigorously previously determined [25,28] . Other statistical parameters [29] were used for the external test set: (i) squared correlation coefficient (r …”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the robustness and predictive power of the model the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) [15] (having the thresholds values higher than 0.85, as they have been rigorously determined by a simulation study [16]). …”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%