2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0954-349x(03)00005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real exchange rate dynamics in transition economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Appendix A, we exemplify a simple extension to the static BS-based approach to the Penn effect, focussing on real factors and reforms (like Coricelli andJazbec, 2004 andGarcía-Solanes et al, 2008). According to this extended approach, real exchange rate developments react to productivity developments, reform-driven quality improvements and sectoral reallocation, and the competition effect of trade liberalisation.…”
Section: Working Paper Nr295mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Appendix A, we exemplify a simple extension to the static BS-based approach to the Penn effect, focussing on real factors and reforms (like Coricelli andJazbec, 2004 andGarcía-Solanes et al, 2008). According to this extended approach, real exchange rate developments react to productivity developments, reform-driven quality improvements and sectoral reallocation, and the competition effect of trade liberalisation.…”
Section: Working Paper Nr295mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) 3) In transition countries a large part of real appreciation accounts for the real appreciation that reflects productivity gains in the tradable sector (due to the Balassa-Samuelson (B-S) effect) This trend is commonly the case in fast growing economies like transition countries where the catch-up process is mainly driven by an increasingly productive tradable sector. For example, Coricelli and Jazbec (2001) estimated that B-S effects in (19 selected) transition countries were between 0.7-1.2 per cent p.a. over the 1990-1998 period.…”
Section: Current Account Developments In Transition Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Hungarian real exchange rate movements can well be explained by Balassa-Samuelson effects, according to Jakab/Kovács (1999). Filipozzi (2000) investigates the real exchange - According to Coricelli/Jazbec (2001), demand factors are significant determinants as well, especially for the Baltics.…”
Section: Ljxuh And3edvhg Uhdo Hiihfwlyh H[fkdqjh Udwhv Ri Fhqwudo Dqg mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is ample evidence that demand does, in fact, influence real exchange rates; see, for example, Coricelli/Jazbec (2001) for transition countries and De Gregorio HW DO (1994) generally. While the latter refer to non-perfect competition and non-perfect capital mobility to explain their results, the theory of international trade suggests that an extension of the Balassa-Samuelson model to consider additional non-tradeable factors could re-establish a link between demand and real exchange rates.…”
Section: Kh K\srwkhvlv Ri %Dodvvd Dqg 6dpxhovrqmentioning
confidence: 99%