2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3404051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Estate Performance, the Macroeconomy and Leverage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ling and Naranjo (1997) find that real estate returns in the U.S. are positively related to the growth rate of consumption, while they are negatively related to the real T-Bill rate, the term spread and unexpected inflation. In line with those results, Delfim and Hoesli (2019b) report that real estate returns are positively linked to real GDP growth, expected inflation, construction costs, money supply and a leading economic indicator, while they are negatively impacted by the inflation surprise and the term and credit spreads. Ho et al (2015) investigate the drivers of real estate returns for 16 Asian cities and the U.S. and find that macroeconomic variables are more useful to predict the returns for the office and retail sectors, than for the residential sector.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Ling and Naranjo (1997) find that real estate returns in the U.S. are positively related to the growth rate of consumption, while they are negatively related to the real T-Bill rate, the term spread and unexpected inflation. In line with those results, Delfim and Hoesli (2019b) report that real estate returns are positively linked to real GDP growth, expected inflation, construction costs, money supply and a leading economic indicator, while they are negatively impacted by the inflation surprise and the term and credit spreads. Ho et al (2015) investigate the drivers of real estate returns for 16 Asian cities and the U.S. and find that macroeconomic variables are more useful to predict the returns for the office and retail sectors, than for the residential sector.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Ling and Naranjo (1997) find that real estate returns in the U.S. are positively related to the growth rate of consumption, while they are negatively related to the real T-Bill rate, the term spread, and unexpected inflation. In line with those results, Delfim and Hoesli (2019b) report that real estate returns are positively linked to real GDP growth, expected inflation, construction costs, money supply, and a leading economic indicator, while they are negatively impacted by the inflation surprise, and the term and credit spreads. Ho et al (2015) investigate the drivers of real estate returns for 16 Asian cities and the U.S. and find that macroeconomic variables are more useful to predict the returns for the office and retail sectors, than for the residential…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In contrast, Giacomini, Ling, & Naranjo (2015) claimed that within levered REITs, those leveraged higher than the targeted leverage level outperformed the lowly leveraged ones, which coincidentally supports the notion of a positive correlation between the degree of leverage and performance. Furthermore, a robust study by Delfim and Hoesli (2019) examines the effect of leverage on the performance of various types of real estate exposures using data from the United States from 1986 to 2017 (direct, non-listed, and listed) and it showed a significant impact on the relationship between them. More recent studies showed the effect of financial leverage on REITs' performance (Khairulanuwar & Chuweni, 2021;Haran et al, 2021;Morri et al, 2021;Milosevic-Avdalovic & Milenkovic, 2017).…”
Section: Financial Leveragementioning
confidence: 99%