2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2723977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Contracts and Mistaken Wages: The Organisation of Work and Pay in London Building Trades 1650-1800

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total duration of the construction work increases instead the likelihood of being employed in a certain week. The fact that workers employed in relatively large construction sites that did last long experienced higher degree of labour mobility is consistent with the characterization of the patterns of casual employment in large-scale enterprises provided by Salzman (1952) and Stephenson (2016). We observe a significant positive effect of calendar working days on the participation process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Total duration of the construction work increases instead the likelihood of being employed in a certain week. The fact that workers employed in relatively large construction sites that did last long experienced higher degree of labour mobility is consistent with the characterization of the patterns of casual employment in large-scale enterprises provided by Salzman (1952) and Stephenson (2016). We observe a significant positive effect of calendar working days on the participation process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“… 3 Even in Great Britain, the cradle of Allen's works, researchers are now debating some of the basic parameters required for the construction of the basket and its comparison with salaries (Humphries and Weisdorf 2016; Stephenson 2016). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Stephenson refers to Voth to question the assumption of constant working hours underlying Allen's claim of high wages in late-eighteenth-century Britain. 37 Allen, defending the claim of high wages, adopts Voth's estimates of a five-day working week and eleven-hour working day in calculating the weekly output of cotton weavers. 38 Allen and Weisdorf use Voth's estimates as benchmarks against which they compare the number of days' work that they estimate to have been needed to buy a certain basket of commodities in order to test the industrious revolution thesis.…”
Section: Existing Work and Uses Of Voth's Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%