Reagent concentration dependent variations in the stability and photoluminescence of silica-coated ZnO nanorods

Abstract

Silica (SiO 2 ) coating is finding increasing use as a means of improving the properties of ZnO nanomaterials. However, the current literature contains seemingly contradictory reports of the effect of such coatings on their photoluminescence (PL) properties. Two types of ZnO nanorod (henceforth termed Types A and B) were synthesized using the same hydrothermal method (differing only in the chosen precursor concentrations), then subjected to the exact same SiO 2 -coating procedure. SiO 2 coating is seen to have a strikingly different effect on the Type A and B nanorod morphologies and their PL. In the case of Type A nanorods, (i.e. nanorods grown using high precursor concentrations), SiO 2 coating has no discernible morphological effect but causes an obvious increase in the intensity of the visible component within the PL emission. Type B nanorods (grown from 20-times less concentrated reactive solution), in contrast, show a very different response to SiO 2 coating: morphologically, they appear as many ZnO nanodots in the silica shell that surrounds the etched ZnO core, and their ultraviolet PL is boosted. Systematic investigation of the effects of various other post-treatments on the PL from Type A and B nanorods leads to the conclusion that the different responses to SiO 2 coating can be traced to the different nanorod growth chemistries -i.e. by precipitation from Zn(OH) 2 intermediates (Type A nanorods) or by direct reaction of Zn 2+ and OH − ions (Type B material). The present study advances our understanding both of the controlled synthesis and of routes to optimising the properties of bare and silica-coated ZnO nanomaterials for nanodevice applications.

Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Ag Nanoparticle-Decorated ZnO Nanorod Arrays

“…Figure 2(a) is the top-view SEM image of SF at low magnification, in which numerous uniformly distributed hexagonal prism-like nanorods can be seen. This is consistent with the typical morphology of ZnO nanorods reported in the literature [27][28][29]. Most nanorods grow perpendicular to the Ti substrate, forming highly <002> oriented nanorod arrays, as also shown in the XRD data.…”

Enhanced ethanol sensing properties of ultrathin ZnO nanosheets decorated with CuO nanoparticles

“…These are assigned to ZnO near-band-gap emission and to defect / impurity-related emissions, respectively. The small blue shift of the UV emission compared to that seen in the PL spectra of many other ZnO nanomaterials [5,[30][31][32][33] (which typically peaks in the 380-390 nm range) implies a significant quantum confinement effect induced by the ultrathin (few nanometer) thickness of these NSs. (Fig.…”

Sensitive Room Temperature Photoluminescence-Based Sensing of H2S with Novel CuO–ZnO Nanorods

“…Typical PL spectra of ZnO show a sharp near-band gap UV emission at ∼380 nm and a broad visible-band emission attributed to various defects and impurities; higher ratios of these emission intensities ( I UV / I vis ) normally indicate samples of higher crystal quality. , Figure compares RT-PL spectra (normalized to the same I UV(max) ) of CuO–ZnO and pure ZnO NRs. These show obvious differences: (1) the UV emission from both samples peaks at ∼380 nm, but the center of the visible band emission is shifted from ∼510 nm in the case of the CuO–ZnO sample to ∼530 nm for pure ZnO; (2) the I UV / I vis value of the former (∼0.6) is very much lower than that of the latter (∼33).…”