1999
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1999)125:5(407)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaeration Equations Derived from U.S. Geological Survey Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
87
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…as a function of water current and depth based on empirical or conceptual approaches, reviewed by Bansal (1973) and more recently by Melching and Flores (1999) and Gualtieri et al (2002). In estuaries, the tidal current can be as high as the gravity flow in streams and, thus, could in theory contribute significantly to k 600 .…”
Section: Contribution Of Water Currents To K 600 -In the Macrotidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a function of water current and depth based on empirical or conceptual approaches, reviewed by Bansal (1973) and more recently by Melching and Flores (1999) and Gualtieri et al (2002). In estuaries, the tidal current can be as high as the gravity flow in streams and, thus, could in theory contribute significantly to k 600 .…”
Section: Contribution Of Water Currents To K 600 -In the Macrotidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty distinct empirical equations for the prediction of K 2 were identified from the literature. Application of the equations was supplemented by use of a USGS database containing information from K 2 measurements made using the tracer-gas method at 493 individual sites, some with multiple measurements under varying flow conditions (Melching and Flores 1999). The equations and K 2 database were used with the site-specific measurements of discharge, reachaverage stream velocity, depth, width, and stream slope to estimate K 2 , as follows:…”
Section: Stream Metabolism Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O elevado valor para K 2 (50%) deve-se à imprecisão das estimativas realizadas pelas equações empíricas (MELCHING & FLORES, 1999;HAIDER et al, 2013).…”
Section: Este Estudo Trata Das Incertezas Associadas Aos Dados De Entunclassified