2019
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readressing the rationale of irradiation in stage I seminoma guidelines: a critical essay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,24-28 However, this observed higher risk of secondary malignancies must be viewed critically, as radiation dose, treatment volume and technique have improved remarkably since publication of the above cited studies. 14,26 Treatment field and dose reduction, and improvements in dose planning have demonstrated to significantly reduce the incidence of secondary malignancies. [29][30][31] Because the TE18 trial showed the noninferiority of 20 Gy compared with 30 Gy, the recommended radiation dose for CS I is now 20 Gy in 10 fractions applied in a para-aortic strip field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,24-28 However, this observed higher risk of secondary malignancies must be viewed critically, as radiation dose, treatment volume and technique have improved remarkably since publication of the above cited studies. 14,26 Treatment field and dose reduction, and improvements in dose planning have demonstrated to significantly reduce the incidence of secondary malignancies. [29][30][31] Because the TE18 trial showed the noninferiority of 20 Gy compared with 30 Gy, the recommended radiation dose for CS I is now 20 Gy in 10 fractions applied in a para-aortic strip field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, radiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma has declined in recent years. [10][11][12] According to research by Powles and colleagues, there was a nonsignificant increase in mortality over a period of nine years following the administration of carboplatin in the context of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular events. 13 Additionally, they could not confirm the lower incidence of secondary cancers, which is often considered a benefit of chemotherapy compared to radiation therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in recent studies, radiotherapy was significantly associated with severe side effects; therefore, the use of RT has been criticized 13. As shown in the study by Maroto et al,14 the risk of a second solid non-germ-cell tumor is approximately doubled after radiotherapy or chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%