2018
DOI: 10.3166/bmsap-2018-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readjustment of the Standard ASUDAS to Encompass Dental Morphological Variations in Plio-Pleistocene Hominins

Abstract: The standard ASUDAS scoring system (Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System) is used to assess dental morphological variations in modern humans. It is also frequently used to study, score, and compare morphological variations in fossil hominin taxa and to examine their phylogenetic relationships. However, using ASUDAS in studies of this type is under debate because it is based on modern Homo sapiens populations and does not appear to cover all variations observed in fossil Plio-Pleistocene homi- ni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unworn features at the OES were primarily described according to the degrees of expression of the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (ASUDAS) (Turner et al, 1991). Since the ASUDAS does not fully cover the variability observed in fossil hominins (Louail & Prat, 2018; Martinón‐Torres et al, 2008, 2012) nor does it focus on the internal dentine morphology, we follow Skinner (2008) and Skinner et al (2008, 2009) in the description of the protostylid, as they consider that it can be expressed along different regions of the buccal face of lower molars and, accordingly, the definition of the trait should not be limited to the region of the buccal groove. The trigonid crest pattern was described and classified, at both enamel and dentine surfaces, according to Martínez de Pinillos et al (2014), whereas the talonid crest was scored following Korenhof's classification (Korenhof, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unworn features at the OES were primarily described according to the degrees of expression of the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (ASUDAS) (Turner et al, 1991). Since the ASUDAS does not fully cover the variability observed in fossil hominins (Louail & Prat, 2018; Martinón‐Torres et al, 2008, 2012) nor does it focus on the internal dentine morphology, we follow Skinner (2008) and Skinner et al (2008, 2009) in the description of the protostylid, as they consider that it can be expressed along different regions of the buccal face of lower molars and, accordingly, the definition of the trait should not be limited to the region of the buccal groove. The trigonid crest pattern was described and classified, at both enamel and dentine surfaces, according to Martínez de Pinillos et al (2014), whereas the talonid crest was scored following Korenhof's classification (Korenhof, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental anthropological analyses often utilize nonmetric crown traits to assess the degree of similarity among global populations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], detect biological kinship within a site [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], establish phylogenetic relationships across taxa [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], explore the population history associated with specific groups or geographic regions , and more recently, to...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%