2004
DOI: 10.1353/elh.2004.0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Virgil's Georgics as a Scientific Text: The Eighteenth-Century Debate between Jethro Tull and Stephen Switzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fourth Georgic, Virgil writes of an old man who is at work on his small patch of land that was at one time not fertile enough to be plowed by oxen, but with his dedicated attention it has been transformed. The lines in this vignette are less didactic and more poetic in the sheer strength of the action and sensuality by use of vivid descriptions of the labor that is needed for all the seasons [ 88 ]. Quint [ 89 ] has proposed in his review of the new translations of Georgics by [ 86 ] and Lembke [ 90 ] that, “ the old gardener thus carries some of the poem's political hopes as well as its ethical message.…”
Section: How Does Your Garden Grow? Definitions History and Purpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fourth Georgic, Virgil writes of an old man who is at work on his small patch of land that was at one time not fertile enough to be plowed by oxen, but with his dedicated attention it has been transformed. The lines in this vignette are less didactic and more poetic in the sheer strength of the action and sensuality by use of vivid descriptions of the labor that is needed for all the seasons [ 88 ]. Quint [ 89 ] has proposed in his review of the new translations of Georgics by [ 86 ] and Lembke [ 90 ] that, “ the old gardener thus carries some of the poem's political hopes as well as its ethical message.…”
Section: How Does Your Garden Grow? Definitions History and Purpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important prior spadework notwithstanding (Barrell, 1988;de Bruyn, 1997de Bruyn, , 2004de Bruyn, , 2005Low, 1985), the current condition of the critical landscape on eighteenth-century georgic is to a large extent the result of its cultivation by Juan Christian Pellicer and David Fairer. Both Pellicer and Fairer, by building on their earlier work (Pellicer, 2000(Pellicer, , 2003(Pellicer, , 2004(Pellicer, , 2006Fairer, 2003aFairer, , 2003bFairer, , 2005Fairer, , 2006 have provided further insights into why georgic proved such a conducive mode to so many of writers of the period (Fairer, 2011b(Fairer, , 2015(Fairer, , 2016Pellicer, 2012Pellicer, , 2018a.…”
Section: Georgicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frans De Bruyn has written extensively on the 'debate Virgil's poem occasioned' in the eighteenth century on 'the scientific or technical merit of the agricultural instructions it conveyed'. 10 Contemporary readers of the Georgics, he argues, 'were predisposed to make strong cognitive claims for the poem', 11 and writers of new agricultural treatises 'relied on the cultural imprimatur of Virgil in order to gain a friendly reception with the reading public'. 12 For De Bruyn, this readerly approach amounted to the construction of a ' "Virgilian discourse" of agricultural science'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%