2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading the reading brain: A new meta-analysis of functional imaging data on reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
134
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
23
134
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the left temporoparietal cortex appeared to be involved in processing sublexical units of Chinese characters (i.e., in mapping among orthography and phonology), while task difficulty was related to activities in a large network, including ventral occipitotemporal, inferior frontal cortices, middle frontal, and insula cortices. These findings are consistent with studies involving the reading of alphabetic words (Bolger, Hornickel, Cone, Burman, & Booth, 2008;Cattinelli, Borghese, Gallucci, & Paulesu, 2013;Fiez, Balota, Raichle, & Petersen, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the left temporoparietal cortex appeared to be involved in processing sublexical units of Chinese characters (i.e., in mapping among orthography and phonology), while task difficulty was related to activities in a large network, including ventral occipitotemporal, inferior frontal cortices, middle frontal, and insula cortices. These findings are consistent with studies involving the reading of alphabetic words (Bolger, Hornickel, Cone, Burman, & Booth, 2008;Cattinelli, Borghese, Gallucci, & Paulesu, 2013;Fiez, Balota, Raichle, & Petersen, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(2) left inferior frontal and left insula are sensitive to effects of processing difficulty, such as word frequency and lexicality effects; and (3) left inferior parietal regions contribute to processing of orthography-to-phonology transformation, either via the grapheme-to-phoneme conversion roles in reading English words or via statistical relationships between phonetic radicals and pronunciations in reading Chinese characters (Cattinelli et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2011). In what follows, we discuss the functional implications of observed activity in these three regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It furthermore prevents orthographic mappings from reduplicating phonological knowledge that is already represented somewhere else in the readers' grammar/brain. Neurolinguistic studies on reading alphabetic orthographies support our proposal: during the reading process, a cluster in the left inferior parietal gyrus is activated, which is usually also involved in non-reading related, sub-lexical phonological processes (see the meta-analysis of existing neuroimaging studies by Cattinelli et al 2013). The assumed influence of phonological knowledge on the reading process furthermore predicts that a phonological deficit or difficulties in accessing phonological representations lead to problems in the acquisition of reading, which has been shown by studies on dyslexia (see e.g.…”
Section: Native Reading: Orthographic Mappings and Phonotactic Constrsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The broad structure of the underlying neural networks has been identified and accompanied by analyses of the functions of the different nodes in that network and their patterns of interconnectivity (see Cattinelli et al, 2013;DiCarlo et al, 2012;Martin, 2007;Price, 2012, for reviews). At the same time, a substantial body of work in cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics has shown that some objects and words are recognized and named consistently faster and with fewer errors than others, and has explored the contribution of factors such as age of acquisition, frequency, imageability and distinctiveness to generating those reliable differences (see Brysbaert and Cortese, 2011;Cortese and Schock, 2013;Davies et al, 2013;Juhasz, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%