2018
DOI: 10.1080/19361653.2018.1533908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading the rainbow: LGBTQ-inclusive literacy instruction in the elementary classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While heterosexuality and traditional families may be most common, we cannot ignore that other identities not only exist in the public around children but are most often already a part of our classroom communities. Whether diverse family identities and intersectionalities exist in our classrooms, we are responsible for providing windows to others' experiences and families through our classroom materials and lessons (Adichie, 2009;Asher, 2002;Ryan & Hermann-Wilmarth, 2018). This ongoing privileging of heterosexuality and traditional family tokenism (Derman-Sparks, 2016) in teaching materials and classroom dialogues, paired with documented avoidance of LGBTQ-headed families in public school curriculum, illustrates why elementary teacher educators must challenge heteronormativity in their coursework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While heterosexuality and traditional families may be most common, we cannot ignore that other identities not only exist in the public around children but are most often already a part of our classroom communities. Whether diverse family identities and intersectionalities exist in our classrooms, we are responsible for providing windows to others' experiences and families through our classroom materials and lessons (Adichie, 2009;Asher, 2002;Ryan & Hermann-Wilmarth, 2018). This ongoing privileging of heterosexuality and traditional family tokenism (Derman-Sparks, 2016) in teaching materials and classroom dialogues, paired with documented avoidance of LGBTQ-headed families in public school curriculum, illustrates why elementary teacher educators must challenge heteronormativity in their coursework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assert that the challenge for grappling with teaching controversial issues, regardless of the issue, is a shared responsibility for faculty and course objectives across programs of teacher education. Moreover, we challenge both our own teaching and our peers in elementary social studies education in a call to action, as our literacy education colleagues (e.g., Ryan & Hermann-Wilmarth, 2018) are increasingly ahead of the game compared to elementary social studies education in regards to deliberately using literature to discuss LGBTQ issues and carving out dialogic spaces for preservice teachers to grapple with not if but meaningful methods for how to do this pedagogical work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Kokozos (2017) explains, LGBTQ+-inclusive social studies curriculum tends to whitewash queer history and thus reinforce white supremacist imaginings of queer community (Bracho & Hayes, 2020). Echoing these concerns, critical literacy scholars have named that intersectionality must be integral to all queer studies work (Blackburn & Smith, 2010;Hermann-Wilmarth & Ryan, 2016;Ryan & Hermann-Wilmarth, 2018;Schey, 2017). Moreover, this research emphasizes the importance of amplifying queer and trans BIPOC community narratives within the ongoing inclusion of LGBTQ+ stories within educational contexts (Boatwright, 2019;Johnson, 2017;miller & Rodriquez, 2016).…”
Section: Composing Practice: Storyingmentioning
confidence: 99%